Prominent activist and political commentator, Deji Adeyanju, has abruptly ended his trip to The Gambia to honor an invitation from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) — a move linked to the recent detention of controversial social media personality, VeryDarkMan.
Adeyanju, who had been enjoying a brief break in the West African nation, announced his decision to return to Nigeria after receiving what he described as a “courteous but firm” invitation from the EFCC. The development adds a fresh twist to the already heated discourse surrounding VeryDarkMan, whose outspoken online persona has repeatedly clashed with both public figures and the law.
Taking to social media, Adeyanju confirmed his change of plans:
“Leaving The Gambia for Abuja this evening. The EFCC has invited me to clarify certain issues relating to the VeryDarkMan case. I will always answer to the law when called."
His statement quickly went viral, prompting widespread speculation about his connection to the ongoing investigation into VeryDarkMan’s activities. Though specifics remain under wraps, insiders hint that Adeyanju may have been cited due to his vocal support for freedom of expression and past public comments on the controversial influencer’s arrests.
VeryDarkMan — known for his no-holds-barred commentary on corruption, celebrity culture, and government policies — has found himself on the wrong side of the law multiple times in recent months. Critics accuse him of defamation, while supporters hail him as a fearless truth-teller.
His latest brush with the law reportedly involves claims made in one of his viral videos, which allegedly contained “inciting” or “false” statements. The EFCC’s involvement in the case suggests there may be financial crime elements or broader national security implications being investigated.
For Adeyanju, a seasoned human rights activist, the EFCC invitation is not new territory. He’s faced scrutiny and even detention in the past for his protest actions, and he has built a reputation for showing up when the law comes knocking — no matter how contentious the issue.
Observers believe his swift return to Nigeria is a strategic move to demonstrate transparency and assert moral authority in a climate where many public figures often avoid confrontation with legal institutions.
Political analyst Chioma Nwankwo weighed in:
“Adeyanju understands optics. By returning voluntarily, he reinforces his credibility, especially in the eyes of those who value accountability. It also draws attention to the VeryDarkMan case, forcing the public to ask whether this is about justice or silencing dissent.”
While the nature of Adeyanju’s involvement remains speculative, one thing is clear — this saga is far from over. With the EFCC’s role expanding beyond financial crimes into digital expression and activism, the boundaries of lawful dissent and online conduct in Nigeria continue to be tested.
Whether Adeyanju’s upcoming meeting with the Commission will result in a new twist or simply clarify existing confusion remains to be seen. In the meantime, the public is watching closely, and the stakes — both for free speech and public trust — are high.
